In General Conference this week one of the Twelve Apostles, Jeffrey Holland said (paraphrased) that many Christians err in the verses in Revelation 22:18-19 that state:
18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book
President Holland goes on to state that the “words of the book of this prophecy” are pertaining to only the book of Revelation and that having additional scripture such as the Book of Mormon is not adding or taking away from the book of Revelation. He says many Christians err in that they think the “book of this prophecy” is the whole Bible and that many books in the Bible were written well after the book of Revelation was written.
If this is the case, one could argue that even though Joseph Smith translated the Book of Mormon and other scripture, he did indeed add to the book of Revelation in at least five chapters which you can view here (make sure to scroll down to the bottom of the page to view the Book of Revelation translations). One could argue that the hard life Joseph led and the imprisonments he had to face, the many babies that he and Emma had that died, and ultimately what caused his death were all part of the curses described in the book of Revelation.
The curse in Revelation doesn’t only mention adding to the book, but taking away from the book as well. One could argue on the other hand that Joseph Smith wasn’t adding anything, but he was restoring the “plain and precious truths” that were taken out of the Bible as the Book of Mormon suggests. One could argue that the “curses” that came as a result were persecution that has happened to other earlier Christians who translated the Bible or to those who don’t have the “fulness of the gospel.” One could argue that Joseph Smith was persecuted because Satan was trying to thwart the work from progressing, etc.
I can see why someone could side on the first option. Especially those Christians who believe the Bible is all God has revealed and ever will reveal and that further revelation isn’t necessary and that throughout all the years there hasn’t been anything taken out of the Bible. However I personally disagree with this. I feel that continuing revelation is necessary and that many truths were indeed taken out of the Bible throughout the years. In addition, if God had prophets and apostles before why wouldn’t he have them now?
What are your thoughts?
15 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 10, 2008 at 3:57 pm
Bethie
Of course continuing revelation is necessary.
That’s why it is being given.
That’s why the Restoration came about.
We live in a blessed time.
God Bless!
LikeLike
April 10, 2008 at 6:18 pm
Dom
I haven’t heard the talk yet, waiting for transcripts and individual talk downloads to be available, thus don’t know what all Elder Holland covered.
I’ve dealt with the Revelation 22:18-19 issue many times talking to Christian friends. I am amazed how many of them don’t know how the Bible was put together.
I’ve run into some that think the Bible was basically handed down from Moses to John and each person that had it wrote their books then passed it to the next, down through the ages until it was closed by John with the Book of Revelation. Nothing lost, nothing added, and everything 100% correct and literal.
What they don’t know is that more then a few books in the Bible were written after Revelation. Revelation was originally a separate text (as was most of the current Bible) and not part of a Book of Books. They don’t know about books that have been removed from the Bible in it’s current compilation. They don’t know about books that were mentioned in the Bible but for one reason or another (some lost, some never included) never made it to compilation.
LikeLike
April 11, 2008 at 12:46 am
patti221
I love common ground! I’m a member of the Community of Christ and the thoughts shared by LDS President Holland ring true for me in regards to how to interpret those pesky verses in the Book of Revelations. From my sharing with those who are of Protestant affiliations their expressions are of “the Bible is complete..it starts from beginning and goes to the end of time.” That may be true to a point. I do believe that the Lord is loving and actively loves all His creation and will always have “more light and truth to reveal”.
LikeLike
April 11, 2008 at 3:59 am
Mormon Heretic
There’s a similar verse in Deuteronomy stating that nobody should add or take away the words of that book either. (I can’t remember the verse off the top of my head–I’ll try to find it.) Anyway, if we went by that, we’d have to throw out most of the Old Testament. The funny thing is Deuteronomy continues on after that verse….
LikeLike
April 11, 2008 at 5:06 am
uft36
You would think in this day and age with all of the information available today that some Christians would change their tactics in trying to prove our Church is wrong. They have been using the same arguements for many years without much change. At one point the Apocrypha was included with the Bible and now it is a separate body of work largely ignored by everyone. Should this be considered taking away or adding to the Bible? The Apocrypha was considered the Word of God as well and if the preachers taught it it was believed. Why do they consider the Book of Mormon any different? The only reason why that I can think of is that they are afraid of change and have become too comfortable in their beliefs. I hope the LDS Church members don’t have the same way of thinking when additional scriptures are brought forward someday.
LikeLike
April 11, 2008 at 3:59 pm
elvisblog
Quite thought-provoking.
LikeLike
April 11, 2008 at 7:13 pm
ht
I thought that Jeffrey got rather hot under the collar speaking about this topic. We tivo’d conference for old times sake and were amazed by the lack of spirit in the room when he spoke. He looked so angry about the fact christian’s were so dead set on not believing there could never be add on’s to the bible.
I actually got quite sick to stomach feeling his harsh tone in that talk. He really came down on the trinitarian christians and I have never seen a talk like his before. And I have spent the majority of my life watching conference talks.
It is very interesting the way you wrote this post. Almost like you didn’t want to take a side and have us give you our opinion first. Very interesting.
Ps I am glad you wrote something other then the humanitarian stuff. It was not my cup of tea. I am amazed that anyone can find great joy in the church’s humanitarian relief when corporations like Target give $3 million or more a week to the world help fund.
LikeLike
April 12, 2008 at 5:46 am
Mormon Heretic
HT, $3 million per week for Target? $150 million per year? I didn’t see that on their Financial reports. Where did you get that number? Are you a Target employee?
As for the lack of spirit in the room, I’m sorry to hear that you felt that way. Perhaps the talk was not aimed at you. I enjoyed Elder Holland’s talk. Do you enjoy having Mormons referred to as non-Christians? Is this not offensive to you? I’m not sure if you’re mormon or not, but do you like being told that you don’t worship the true God? Mormons are told this frequently.
Don’t get me wrong–I think there are many wonderful people in other churches, but I don’t like it when they try to define that Mormons are non-Christians. I think it is appropriate that Elder Holland sets the record straight. I didn’t feel he was tearing down their faith, but rather defending ours. There is a difference.
LikeLike
April 12, 2008 at 10:48 pm
ht
Mormon heretic..
There is a big sign as you walk out of target sharing the amount that gets put back into the community.
I do not believe that the mormon religion is christian. I believe they believe in a completely different God then trinitarian christians. Now are they Godly people? Do they help people? Do they believe in Christ? Yes…but in a different one then protestant faiths…there are majorly different doctrinal issues. I was a mormon for most of my life. I left the faith over a year ago and struggle everyday that I believed a lie.
Jeffrey was hot under the collar…anyone who saw it would know that. He was very defensive about the fact that christians don’t accept the mormons. But you mormons don’t believe the same way christians do.
Mormons have a superficial wrapping of christianity and great family values.
I think this religious discussion could go on forever, because as a former mormon I hated it when people told me I was christian, because I converted from christianity and thought it was a better form of christianity. I didn’t realize that it wasn’t. It goes against so much in the bible.
My intent is not to oh fend…only to let you know that mainstream christians will never accept mormons as christians no matter what talks are given from the so called apostles.
LikeLike
April 13, 2008 at 1:42 am
Eric Zacharias
For the record, conservative Christians agree that all the books of the New Testament were written within AD 100, with Revelation being the last written. LIBERAL theologians contest that. It is interesting that religious groups will use LIBERAL theologians to make their point, if it is to their advantage. Groups that have done that include the Jehovah Witnesses and the LDS church (as shown in at least one comment above).
Yes, Revelation does close out the book with a warning (as does Deuteronomy); and yes, the words can be misunderstood to suggest that this is a specific reference to the whole canon of Scripture. However, those words DO reflect how the entirety of Scripture is to be viewed. In the high-priestly prayer (John 17), as Jesus is speaking to the Father, he says “…and Scripture cannot be broken.” This is significant, for it reminds us that God is working with a specific body of writings to bring salvation. Elsewhere, Jesus talks about the Law being fulfilled:”For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.” (Matthew 5:18)
My friends, Jesus is the fulfillment of the Law. Everything begins and ends with Jesus. He is the Word made flesh. He is the Alpha and Omega. He is the reason for salvation. He is Savior and Lord.
And, it bears repeating, that Jesus speaks to the religious leaders and remind them: “You study the Scriptures, for in them you think there is eternal life. These [Scriptures] are the ones that testify about me.”
MY POINT: The Biblical canon we have today was assembled in a careful way. The Holy Spirit inspired HOLY MEN to write, so that what they wrote was entirely of God. Note, also, that NO PROPHET desired to write Scripture; they were moved as God called them to write (consider Jonah, Ezekiel, Jeremiah). The purpose of Scripture is to call us to see our salvation, our redemption in Jesus Christ. He is what makes us saints, for in him is forgiveness. Where there is forgiveness, there is eternal life.
“Progressive revelation” is a nice thought — and certainly is possible! — BUT ALL revelation needs to point to Jesus as the only Son of God, who brings about salvation. There have been many prophets since Jesus’ time, but every Scripture stands or falls on its ability to focus on Scripture. That is why Paul was not rejected by the Bereans; they searched the Scriptures to see if what Paul preached was in accord to the rest of Scripture. It was, and they became Christians. In the same way, any preacher or Pope or prophet is not to be followed if it takes our eyes off of the Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
Sydney Rigdon intended to generate a new Israel in America and then sat down to write the corpus which became Smith’s Book of Mormon. Is that the work of the Holy Spirit or what? http://www.mormonstudies.com/criddle/rigdon.htm#4
LikeLike
April 13, 2008 at 2:26 am
ht
Mormon Heretic
P.s.
I have never seen target’s financial statements, but I bet I see them long before the mormon church would ever let the public see their financial records.
LikeLike
April 13, 2008 at 6:26 am
Mormon Heretic
HT, thanks for clarifying your position. I’m sorry you felt deluded. Yes I do believe we have different perceptions of Jesus. I am much more comfortable being called a non-trinitarian than a non-Christian. I think it more accurately reflects the difference between mormons and protestants.
To most people, the term non-Christian implies Mormons don’t believe in Christ. Jews, Hindus, Muslims, Taoists, Sikhs, all freely admit that they don’t believe Christ is the Son of God, and are certainly proud of being non-Christians.
Mormons, Catholics, and protestants believe Jesus was born of Mary, died on the cross for our sins, performed miracles, etc, etc. I clearly acknowledge that Mormons have major differences in theology compared to other Christian groups. However, Mormon beliefs are much closer to protestants and catholics than to any of these other truly non-Christian groups. Mormons don’t worship cows, Muhammed, nature, or any thing else. For other Christians to mislabel Mormons as non-Christian is complete misinformation. Feel free to call mormons non-trinitarians, and you will not get any arguments, and you will more accurately reflect the differences in theology. But to call Mormons “non-Christians” is gross misinformation. Are mormons really Hindus? Is that a more accurate label?
—–
I don’t shop at Target, but I just checked their website and they are certainly advertising this $3 million per week as you said. They are a public company, so by law, they have to disclose their financial statements. I’m no financial expert, but on page 51 of their most recent statement it reads “Goodwill totaled $60 million at February 2, 2008 and February 3, 2007.” You can look it up. While this is certainly commendable, it is much closer to $1 million per week than $3 million.
On page 2 of that same statement, they sold $61.5 BILLION. Let’s put that in perspective. They donated 0.1% of their sales. My guess is that you probably donate a higher percentage of your income.
——
LikeLike
April 13, 2008 at 6:29 am
Mormon Heretic
Eric, please enlighten me on how conservative Christians believe the New Testament was constructed. Was Matthew written first, followed by Mark, Luke, and John, then all the letters of Paul, in order, and finally Revelations? This is an honest question, because apparently I am only aware of how liberal theologians understand the Bible was brought forth.
I was not aware that conservatives completely reject these timelines. And do conservatives believe that Constantine had anything to do with compiling the Bible? What do conservatives know about Gnostic Gospels? (I’m sure they reject them, but what do they know about them?) Are conservatives familiar with Marcion, Gnostics, and other diverse Christian groups? Honestly, I don’t know, and am very curious.
Also, do conservatives have an explanation as to why God spoke with Adam, Noah, on down through Malachi (roughly 6000 BC to 400 BC), then quit talking for 400 years, then there were many revelations through Jesus and his followers for the next, what 50-100 years, then the heavens were silent again for the next 2000 years? Why are there these 2 gaps lasting centuries?
You say that all revelation must point to Jesus. I agree. Also, can you send the link again? It is broken for me, and I wasn’t able to read it. Having said that, I am familiar with many theories as to how Joseph forged the Book of Mormon. As I am certain this is your position, let me state that there is certainly a multitude of theories, and no clear consensus among non-mormon groups. I am sure you found the site compelling.
I just want to ask you some questions. There are those who believe Moses was a myth, the Exodus never happened, the Red Sea was never divided, etc. These skeptics choose to believe the Bible is just a bunch of fairy tales. Why do you choose to believe the Bible, against all these atheists who believe the creation story was just the Jewish equivalent of myths of the day. Skeptics say that Ceaser walked on water too, turned water to wine, etc., and that Christians merely puppet these myths to make Jesus sound divine. Why do you choose to discard this so-called “evidence.” Skeptics will say you have no proof of Jesus’ divinity.
It seems to me you are employing the same types of arguments against mormonism as atheists employ against the Bible. Why do you choose to follow believers instead of atheists? (And please don’t say there is evidence of the authenticity of the Bible, because for every evidence you find, an atheist will find some equally convincing evidence–at least to them–supporting their belief in the fallibility of the Bible.)
LikeLike
April 13, 2008 at 7:26 am
ama49
#10
I love what you said and will highlight it:
MY POINT: The Biblical canon we have today was assembled in a careful way. The Holy Spirit inspired HOLY MEN to write, so that what they wrote was entirely of God. Note, also, that NO PROPHET desired to write Scripture; they were moved as God called them to write (consider Jonah, Ezekiel, Jeremiah). The purpose of Scripture is to call us to see our salvation, our redemption in Jesus Christ. He is what makes us saints, for in him is forgiveness. Where there is forgiveness, there is eternal life.
“Progressive revelation” is a nice thought — and certainly is possible! — BUT ALL revelation needs to point to Jesus as the only Son of God, who brings about salvation. There have been many prophets since Jesus’ time, but every Scripture stands or falls on its ability to focus on Scripture. That is why Paul was not rejected by the Bereans; they searched the Scriptures to see if what Paul preached was in accord to the rest of Scripture. It was, and they became Christians. In the same way, any preacher or Pope or prophet is not to be followed if it takes our eyes off of the Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.
#13 has some good questions to ponder as well in relation to what you said.
If you approach belief in the Book of Mormon the same way you’ve approached your belief in the Bible you will find it points to Christ in a clear and consise way and the Holy Spirit will testify of it’s truthfullness to you, if you want to know.
LikeLike
April 13, 2008 at 7:30 am
ama49
#7
I had a very different experience than you had. I felt the spirit as he talked confirm the truthfulness of what he was saying.
Sorry you don’t like the humanitarian post, but again I felt the Spirit very strongly as I listened to his talk about helping others.
Also, it is o.k. if you don’t agree with LDS perspectives…if you are happy with the route you’re going and you feel led to take it, then that’s what’s important. Calling me non-christain doesn’t offend me b/c what you believe is your perrogative.
LikeLike